Skip to main content
Nuts & Legumes

Production de fèves et féveroles dans l'UE : Gagnants & perdants [2016–2025]

Ce rapport décennal sur la production de fèves et féveroles dans l'UE montre que le Danemark a presque doublé sa production (TCAC de 9,30%), que l'Allemagne, la France et la Pologne ont enregistré des gains solides, tandis que la Suède a vu sa production presque diminuer de moitié (-6,53% de TCAC).

Published Jul 11, 2026|Dataset: apro_cpsh1

Trajectoire de production sur 10 ans: Étoiles montantes et producteurs en déclin

Across the EU-27, total broad and field beans production rose from 1,265.5 thousand tonnes in 2016 to 1,481.3 thousand tonnes in 2025 — a net gain of 215.8 thousand tonnes (+17.1%), equivalent to a 1.77% CAGR.

Germany ranked as the largest producer by total volume over the decade and showed a clear ascending trajectory (a 4.45% CAGR, +73.7 thousand tonnes), rising from 153.7 thousand tonnes in 2016 to 227.4 thousand tonnes in 2025. Lithuania and France completed the top three: Lithuania grew at a more moderate 2.25% CAGR (+46.3 thousand tonnes), while France posted a 4.06% CAGR (+85.3 thousand tonnes), though its 2020 value carries a break-in-series flag reflecting a methodological change.

The decade's rising stars were Denmark, Germany, and France. Denmark recorded the fastest relative growth (a 9.30% CAGR, +45.9 thousand tonnes, +122.6%), nearly doubling its output from 37.5 thousand tonnes to 83.4 thousand tonnes. Poland also moved decisively higher (a 2.40% CAGR, +20.7 thousand tonnes), with its 2025 value flagged as estimated. Latvia grew modestly (a 1.27% CAGR, +12.1 thousand tonnes). Italy was essentially flat (-0.14% CAGR, -1.5 thousand tonnes, classified as Stable). The only clear loser was Sweden (-6.53% CAGR, -46.8 thousand tonnes, -45.5%), which saw output fall from 102.7 thousand tonnes to just 55.9 thousand tonnes. EU-27 production was notably volatile — after a trough of 995.4 thousand tonnes in 2018, output recovered to 1,248.3 thousand tonnes in 2020 before oscillating between 1,121.8 and 1,481.3 thousand tonnes through 2025.

All values in 1 000 t. b = break in series, e = estimated, p = provisional.

Country2016201720182019202020212022202320242025CAGRNet Change (1 000 t)Trajectory
Germany153.7188.8160.8159.5235.8235.9249.5175.3244.1227.4+4.45%+73.7Ascending
Lithuania209.3229.8149.7127.4218.8136.4210.7190.6234.1255.6+2.25%+46.3Ascending
France197.8199.1142.5177.4147.6b184.2157.8216.3216.3283.1+4.06%+85.3Ascending
Italy113.3105.4115.2132.3134.9118.698.399.8114.4111.9-0.14%-1.5Stable
Latvia100.3140.781.273.5106.560.693.473.992.6112.4+1.27%+12.1Ascending
Poland86.882.281.863.078.397.4102.494.5115.3107.5e+2.40%+20.7Ascending
Denmark37.564.269.763.578.481.0103.074.273.383.4+9.30%+45.9Ascending
Sweden102.7108.134.459.557.748.277.747.751.155.9-6.53%-46.8Declining
EU-271265.51374.2995.41029.91248.31121.81285.91155.81390.81481.3+1.77%+215.8Ascending

Tableau de stabilité d'approvisionnement: Classement de fiabilité

Volume leadership and supply reliability are rarely held by the same producer. Ranking the top eight broad and field beans producers by coefficient of variation (CV) — where a lower CV means steadier year-to-year output — reveals a clear hierarchy.

Italy is the most stable supplier by a wide margin (CV 10.04%, max drawdown -17.05%), placing it in the "very stable" threshold (CV < 10%). Poland ranks second (CV 16.2%, max drawdown -23.03%), and Germany third (CV 18.21%, max drawdown -29.74%) — both in the moderately stable range (CV 10–20%). France (CV 20.43%) sits just above the volatility threshold.

At the volatile end, Sweden (CV 35.83%, max drawdown -68.19%) is the least reliable — a buyer sourcing exclusively from Sweden would have endured supply swings from a 108.1 thousand tonne peak in 2017 to a 34.4 thousand tonne trough in 2018. Latvia (CV 23.48%, max drawdown -43.1%), Denmark (CV 21.89%, max drawdown -27.93%), and Lithuania (CV 21.31%, max drawdown -37.66%) also fall in the volatile zone. Among the top eight producers, only Italy achieved the "very stable" threshold, while three others — Poland, Germany, and France — stayed within the moderately stable range. The remaining four producers all exceeded 20% CV, underscoring the inherent variability in broad and field beans production across much of the EU.

CV < 10% = Very stable; CV 10–20% = Moderately stable; CV > 20% = Volatile.

CountryMean (1 000 t)CV%Max Drawdown%Years Below MeanStability Rank
Italy114.410.04%-17.05%61
Poland90.916.20%-23.03%52
Germany203.118.21%-29.74%53
France192.220.43%-28.39%54
Lithuania196.221.31%-37.66%45
Denmark72.821.89%-27.93%46
Latvia93.523.48%-43.10%67
Sweden64.335.83%-68.19%78

Évolution de l'allocation des terres: Transformation des terres agricoles sur 10 ans

Broad and field beans acreage expanded across the EU-27 over the decade. Total harvested area rose from 477.9 thousand hectares in 2016 to 528.8 thousand hectares in 2025 — a net gain of 50.9 thousand hectares (+10.6%, a 1.13% annualized growth rate).

Six of the eight top producers expanded their area. Denmark posted the most dramatic increase (+72.8%, a 6.26% annualized rate), followed by Germany (+71.4%, +6.17%/yr), France (+44.3%, +4.16%/yr), Lithuania (+26.0%, +2.60%/yr), Poland (+21.8%, +2.21%/yr), and Latvia (+18.9%, +1.94%/yr). Italy (-7.3%, -0.84%/yr) and Sweden (-49.4%, -7.29%/yr) reduced their acreage.

Comparing production CAGR against area growth rates reveals distinct patterns. Denmark's production growth (9.30% CAGR) outpaced its area expansion (6.26%/yr), suggesting yield improvements on existing acreage. Germany's production growth (4.45%) was slightly below its area growth (6.17%), indicating some yield dilution. France's production (4.06%) roughly tracked its area growth (4.16%), implying stable per-hectare productivity. Lithuania and Poland also showed balanced dynamics, with their production growth rates (2.25% and 2.40%) aligning closely with their area expansion (2.60% and 2.21%), reinforcing that the overall output gains across the EU were driven primarily by land allocation rather than step-change yield improvements.

All values in 1 000 ha. b = break in series, e = estimated.

Country2016201720182019202020212022202320242025Net Change (1 000 ha)Growth RateTrend
Germany38.846.455.349.258.757.671.160.961.766.5+27.7+6.17%Expanding
Lithuania67.567.169.955.158.476.255.380.390.385.0+17.5+2.60%Expanding
France77.877.457.263.176.3b78.068.180.280.4112.2+34.4+4.16%Expanding
Italy56.157.156.865.667.562.553.549.853.452.0-4.1-0.84%Contracting
Latvia30.738.240.124.928.533.425.532.131.236.5+5.8+1.94%Expanding
Poland32.931.236.027.228.435.933.237.046.340.1e+7.2+2.21%Expanding
Denmark10.915.225.417.019.222.124.523.018.418.8+7.9+6.26%Expanding
Sweden29.530.526.318.219.620.222.220.016.214.9-14.6-7.29%Contracting
EU-27477.9495.8469.4408.9447.2473.6435.5477.6499.3528.8+50.9+1.13%Expanding

Frequently Asked Questions

Quel pays de l'UE a le plus augmenté sa production de fèves et féveroles entre 2016 et 2025?

Le Danemark a enregistré la croissance relative la plus rapide, presque doublant sa production (+122,6%, un TCAC de 9,30% de 37,5 à 83,4 milliers de tonnes). L'Allemagne a réalisé le plus fort gain absolu (+73,7 milliers de tonnes, un TCAC de 4,45%). La Suède a enregistré la baisse la plus marquée (-45,5%, un TCAC de -6,53%).

Quel est le fournisseur de fèves et féveroles le plus stable de l'UE?

L'Italie était le fournisseur le plus fiable, avec le coefficient de variation le plus bas (10,04%) et une baisse maximale de seulement -17,05%. La Pologne se classait deuxième (CV 16,2%), suivie de l'Allemagne (CV 18,21%).

La superficie de fèves et féveroles de l'UE est-elle en expansion ou en contraction?

La superficie récoltée de l'UE-27 a augmenté de 50 900 hectares (+10,6%) entre 2016 et 2025. Le Danemark (+72,8%) et l'Allemagne (+71,4%) ont mené l'expansion, tandis que la Suède (-49,4%) et l'Italie (-7,3%) ont réduit leurs superficies.

Source data extracted from Eurostat dataset apro_cpsh1.

This article was generated using AI. The content is based on Eurostat data and is provided as a starting point — please verify all data with the original source.

Articles Connexes